I usually try not to comment about controversial things in
social media environments. It usually is fruitless and it ends up just being a
stressful, frustrating waste of time.
But sometimes, people hit a nerve and cross a line with me.
In the linked article on faithit.com, we are told about Joyce Meyer opening up about her father raping her when she was younger. Many comments I could relate to. But some I found outrageous. And they weren't outrageous in the normal social media way. No one was telling her that she probably wanted it or was making outlandish and blasphemous statements about human sexuality that incorporated religious imagery. There weren't even any Christians chiming in that she's a heretic, which surprised me.
No, the comments that really made me mad were comments that were in some way really trying to be godly and biblical. That probably is what made me detest them the most.
While it is no secret that the Roman Catholic Church has rightfully gained a reputation for being shockingly bad at dealing with sexual abuse, the rest of Christendom doesn't exactly have a stellar reputation to boast about either...
I left a lengthy comment, and with the background info I just gave, I think the comment I left does a good job of saying what I needed to say:
My Thoughts on the Joyce Meyer Comments
I see numerous people
saying that Joyce Meyers shouldn't have brought this up because she apparently
had forgiven her abuser in the past.
You people make me feel
ashamed to be a Christian.
I'm not exaggerating. You
really do. You do because you play into the stereotype that Christians don’t
care about sexual abuse victims. Instead, we only care about pretending that it
never happened, and we blame the victim for making that more difficult to do.
You aren't stupid. You
know full well that even God, who is the ultimate forgiver of sins, does not
literally forget sins or completely pretend that they did not happen. If He
did, how would we know about King David sleeping with (and possibly even
raping) the married Bathsheba and then murdering her husband Uriah? If God
truly forgot sins and made like they never happened at all, how would we know
that Peter denied Jesus three times? Or how would we know that Moses sinned
against God and was not allowed to enter the promised land? Or how would we
know that Paul murdered God’s children for their faith (in intent if not in
completed action)? How do we know all these things? We know them because God
recorded the events in His word. Despite all these and many other named sinners
surely being forgiven and given eternal life, God has told millions and
millions of people about what they did.
Forgiveness does not mean
never mentioning that a sin happened, even if there is good reason to. God
surely had good reasons to include the sins of many saints in the Bible! True,
in our daily lives, many sins that a person commits do not need to be brought
up again if the person has repented. But surely a young girl who was raped by
the man who was supposed to be her father has all sorts of reasons to want to
bring it up, even decades later.
And it’s not like she’s
doing it to rub it in the face of her sperm donor (which is a more appropriate
title than “dad” or “father”) and make him feel bad. He’s long since died. He
isn’t here to hear about it now. If he really did repent and was saved, as some
have indicated, then great. We are all saved sinners and so we should be glad
when another sinner is saved. But that’s not the point.
She is telling the story probably for many reasons, and at least some of them are surely valid. It is valid to tell of these things to encourage other survivors and let them know they are not alone. It is perfectly reasonable to speak of these things because it highlights the power of God to heal those in need. And really, it is totally valid for a victim to speak of that happened simply because the scars still remain and telling a sympathetic ear makes them feel batter. This can of course be twisted and used for malicious purposes, but the fact that she forgave her abuser does mean that she must necessarily be silent.
She is telling the story probably for many reasons, and at least some of them are surely valid. It is valid to tell of these things to encourage other survivors and let them know they are not alone. It is perfectly reasonable to speak of these things because it highlights the power of God to heal those in need. And really, it is totally valid for a victim to speak of that happened simply because the scars still remain and telling a sympathetic ear makes them feel batter. This can of course be twisted and used for malicious purposes, but the fact that she forgave her abuser does mean that she must necessarily be silent.
This isn’t about
forgiveness. Come on now, really think about it. Is that really what this is
about? I certainly wouldn’t say that God has failed to properly forgive Peter,
would you? So then, why are people jumping down Joyce Meyer’s throat for daring
to speak out about something that happened in her past? Seriously, why are you?
Maybe because I wasn’t raised in a Christian home, or because I didn't go to
the right kind of church, I don’t understand this subconscious need to sweep
this stuff under the rug , this subconscious need for the person who
mentioned it to be the one in the wrong, this subconscious need that would have
led me to remember a brief phrase in the Psalms and at the same time forget the
rest of the Bible.
But stop it. Just stop it.
Stop looking for reasons to minimize sexual abuse and find fault with the
victims.
No comments:
Post a Comment